Will Congress enact a ban on congressional stock trading before January 3, 2027?YES 34% 3%Will cannabis be federally legalized or descheduled before January 1, 2029?YES 58% 2%Will there be a federal government shutdown before October 1, 2026?YES 41% 5%Will Republicans keep control of the U.S. House in the 2026 midterms?YES 52% 1%Will the Senate confirm a Supreme Court nominee in 2026?YES 71% 2%Will a federal minimum wage increase be enacted before January 1, 2028?YES 22% 1%Will Congress enact a comprehensive federal AI framework law before January 1, 2028?YES 47% 4%Will a comprehensive border security bill become law before January 2027?YES 62% 1%Will Democrats win control of the U.S. Senate in the 2026 midterms?YES 44% 2%Will the Republican candidate win Ohio's 2026 U.S. Senate race?YES 58% 3%Will the Federal Reserve cut its policy rate at the July 2026 FOMC meeting?YES 68% 9%Will the NBER declare a U.S. recession beginning in 2026?YES 24% 3%Will Medicare drug-price negotiation be expanded to 30+ drugs before 2028?YES 36% 2%Will pandemic-era Medicare telehealth flexibilities be made permanent before 2027?YES 74% 1%Will Congress enact a ban on congressional stock trading before January 3, 2027?YES 34% 3%Will cannabis be federally legalized or descheduled before January 1, 2029?YES 58% 2%Will there be a federal government shutdown before October 1, 2026?YES 41% 5%Will Republicans keep control of the U.S. House in the 2026 midterms?YES 52% 1%Will the Senate confirm a Supreme Court nominee in 2026?YES 71% 2%Will a federal minimum wage increase be enacted before January 1, 2028?YES 22% 1%Will Congress enact a comprehensive federal AI framework law before January 1, 2028?YES 47% 4%Will a comprehensive border security bill become law before January 2027?YES 62% 1%Will Democrats win control of the U.S. Senate in the 2026 midterms?YES 44% 2%Will the Republican candidate win Ohio's 2026 U.S. Senate race?YES 58% 3%Will the Federal Reserve cut its policy rate at the July 2026 FOMC meeting?YES 68% 9%Will the NBER declare a U.S. recession beginning in 2026?YES 24% 3%Will Medicare drug-price negotiation be expanded to 30+ drugs before 2028?YES 36% 2%Will pandemic-era Medicare telehealth flexibilities be made permanent before 2027?YES 74% 1%
All markets
Government AccountabilityFederal Trending Open

Will Congress enact a ban on congressional stock trading before January 3, 2027?

12.8K forecasters 2,140,500 credits committed Closes Dec 20, 2026 (6mo left) Resolves Jan 3, 2027
YES
34%
NO
66%
24h change
3pt
39%24%JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJUL
YES probability · All view · demonstration series

Peer-to-Peer Order Book

Live
PriceContractsDepth
40¢1,339sell
39¢2,386sell
38¢1,807sell
37¢1,940sell
36¢1,800sell
35¢575sell
34¢ last · YESspread 2¢
33¢620buy
32¢602buy
31¢866buy
30¢922buy
29¢2,056buy
28¢554buy
How peer-to-peer trading works
  1. A participant offers to buy or sell a contract at a price they choose.
  2. Another participant takes the opposite side.
  3. The exchange matches the orders and holds the collateral.
  4. Correct contracts settle at $1.00 · incorrect at $0.00.
  5. Fees are shown before any order is submitted.
Quorly does not win when you lose. Orders are matched with other market participants — never against Quorly. In a live real-money integration, trading is provided by a regulated exchange partner and Quorly may receive a disclosed share of transaction fees. Real-money trading is currently disabled; this demo book displays Q-Credit depth.

What this market asks

In plain language: forecasters are estimating the probability that the outcome in the question actually happens by the deadline. The market currently prices 34% YES / 66% NO. Resolution is mechanical — it depends only on the criteria and sources below, not on opinions, headlines, or who "deserves" to win the argument.

Why YES
  • H.R. 1234 (Restoring Trust in Congress Act) cleared committee with bipartisan cosponsors from both parties.
  • Public Pulse shows 83% support across party lines — one of the least divided issues tracked on the platform.
  • Leadership in both chambers has signaled floor time before the fall recess in an election year.
Why NO
  • Similar bills have cleared committee in three previous Congresses and never received a floor vote.
  • Disagreement over whether spouses and dependents are covered has stalled every compromise draft.
  • A crowded fall calendar (appropriations, NDAA) leaves a narrow window before the lame-duck session.

Resolution criteria

Reviewed

Resolves YES if a bill prohibiting members of Congress (or members and spouses) from trading individual stocks is signed into law before 12:00 PM ET on January 3, 2027. Blind-trust-only requirements count; disclosure-only reforms do not.

Primary source
Congress.gov enrolled bill status
Backup source
Federal Register / White House signing statements
Dispute process
  1. Any participant may flag a resolution within 72 hours with cited evidence.
  2. Trading pauses; positions freeze at last price while flags are reviewed.
  3. An independent resolution council (rotating, disclosed members) rules within 14 days using only the stated sources.
  4. Rulings are published with full written reasoning; credits settle after publication.

Discussion · 482 comments

Live
Y
C
CivicOwlNO case1w ago

The NO side is about timelines, not merits. Even if the outcome eventually happens, the deadline in the criteria is doing a lot of work.

M
MidwestModelerTop 100Evidence38m ago

Committee calendar update: relevant action is now scheduled. In backtests of this market class, a scheduled action adds ~6 points to YES within a week.

C
CalibratedCarlaYES case5h ago

YES at 34% is the value side. When the resolution source is this mechanical, momentum in the underlying process matters more than commentary.

Q
QuantQuinnEvidence1d ago

Committee calendar update: relevant action is now scheduled. In backtests of this market class, a scheduled action adds ~6 points to YES within a week.

C
CivicVetVerifiedNO case4d ago

Fading the crowd here. "Similar bills have cleared committee in three previous Congresses and never received a floor vote." That blocker has killed similar outcomes repeatedly — I have fair value near 24%.

P
PolicyOracleYES case2d ago

The market is underpricing this. Base rates on comparable outcomes put fair value closer to 42%. Holding YES at 29 entry.

D
DataDrivenAnalystNO case3d ago

The NO side is about timelines, not merits. Even if the outcome eventually happens, the deadline in the criteria is doing a lot of work.

B
BeltwayBayesComment3h ago

This market pairs well with the related Pulse question — the gap between public sentiment and market probability is the interesting signal here.

L
Liberty1776Top ForecasterYES case12m ago

YES at 34% is the value side. When the resolution source is this mechanical, momentum in the underlying process matters more than commentary.

G
GrassrootsGwenComment38m ago

Following this one closely. The resolution criteria are unusually clean, which is why participation is this high (12.8K forecasters).

P
PrairiePunditEvidence3h ago

Committee calendar update: relevant action is now scheduled. In backtests of this market class, a scheduled action adds ~6 points to YES within a week.

S
SignalSeekerYES case5h ago

The market is underpricing this. Base rates on comparable outcomes put fair value closer to 42%. Holding YES at 29 entry.

Demonstration data — not a live government record

Open a position

Balance 10,000
Entry probability34%
If resolves YES0 cr
Potential gain+0 cr
If resolves NO0 cr
Q Credits have no cash value and cannot be purchased, withdrawn, or transferred. Positions are forecasts that affect reputation only.

Market facts

Status Open
CategoryGovernment Accountability
JurisdictionFederal
ClosesDec 20, 2026
Resolves byJan 3, 2027
Followers3.1K
Comments482